GLP/GCLP digital PCR services
Digital PCR (dPCR) assay design, validation, and analysis for advanced therapy bioanalysis, meeting FDA and EMA expectations.
Custom dPCR assay design and validation
Digital PCR for advanced therapy bioanalysis
Unlike qPCR, digital PCR does not require a standard curve, saving time, reagents, and reference samples while minimizing matrix effects. More importantly, it eliminates variability introduced by interpolation in standard curve-based methods, enhancing accuracy and reproducibility.
The lower variability and absolute quantification capability of dPCR makes it ideal for high-precision applications such as copy number variation (CNV) and vector copy number (VCN) analysis for biodistribution, shedding, pharmacokinetics, and transgene expression in advanced therapies.
Digital PCR is less sensitive to inhibition, offers higher precision for quantifying rare targets, and can detect changes as small as 10%, making it optimal for low-copy number detection.
Method development and assay design for digital PCR
Method development for digital PCR (dPCR) is similar to that of qPCR in many aspects. The optimization of nucleic acid extraction, the reverse transcription (RT) step for RNA-to-cDNA conversion, and primer and probe design follow the same principles.
However, an assay validated on qPCR cannot be directly transferred to dPCR without a new validation, as the two platforms have different quantification ranges and behave differently.
Digital PCR assay design and validation services
Confirm amplification, specificity, and efficiency
Feasibility testing serves as a proof-of-concept to evaluate whether the dPCR assay can effectively detect and quantify the target nucleic acid under real conditions.
Primary output: Go/no-go decision for further development
Optimize reaction conditions and assay performance
Method development aims to fine-tune assay performance for optimal sensitivity, specificity, and robustness. The development includes optimizing dPCR reaction component concentrations, refining thermal cycling conditions to improve efficiency, and minimizing variability between runs.
Primary output: Optimized protocol ready for qualification
Assay performance assessment and full regulatory-grade validation
Method qualification confirms that a dPCR method meets key criteria before full validation, including specificity, precision, LOD, LOQ, and robustness. Once qualified, regulatory-grade validation ensures compliance by assessing accuracy, linearity, dynamic range, and sample stability.
Primary output: A validated, regulatory-compliant assay for regulated applications.
Category | Feasibility | Method Development | Method Qualification | Method Validation |
Validation or sample analysis study plan | Optional | Required | Required | |
Assay Design | 3 Designs per target | 3 Designs per target | 3 Designs per target | 3 Designs per target |
Assay Efficiency and Amplicon Confirmation | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Establish calibration curve parameters | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Linear Range of Assay | √ | √ | √ | |
Accuracy and Precision in surrogate matrix (buffer) | 2 runs, 5 levels, 3 sets | |||
Extraction Efficiency | 3 kits, 1 level of spike, QC of nucleic acids Quality and Integrity, 1 repeat | 1 kit, 3 levels of spike, QC of nucleic acids Quality and Integrity, 2 repeats | 1 kit, 3 levels of spike, QC of nucleic acids Quality and Integrity, 2 repeats | |
Minimum Required Dilution (MRD) | √ | √ | √ | |
Accuracy and Precision in authentic matrix | 2 runs, 5 levels, 3 sets | 3 runs, 5 levels, 3 repeats | 6 runs, 5 levels, 3 repeats | |
Selectivity and Specificity in authentic matrix | Optional | √ | √ | |
Dilution linearity | Optional | √ | √ | |
Stability | Optional | Optional | √ | |
Data QC | 20% | 50% or 100% | 100% | |
QA involvement | Optional | √ | ||
Report | √ | √ | √ | |
Acceptance criteria | Depending on Context of Use | Depending on Context of Use | Depending on Context of Use | |
QC levels | LLOQ, LQC, MQC, HQC, ULOQ | LLOQ, LQC, MQC, HQC, ULOQ | LLOQ, LQC, MQC, HQC, ULOQ |
GLP for qPCR and dPCR
We are accredited for Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) by the Swedish Board for Accreditation and Conformity Assessment (SWEDAC) for qPCR, dPCR, and molecular biology.
dPCR services at TATAA
Samples
- Tissues
- Blood
- Liquid biopsies
- Fresh frozen
- FFPE
- EDTA
- PAX
Test items
- Vector copy number (VCN)
- Host cell DNA residuals
- Copy number variations (CNVs)
- Cell-free DNA (cfDNA)
- Minimal residual disease (MRD)
- Total RNA
- Messenger RNA (mRNA)
- Micro RNA (miRNA)
- Small interfering RNA (siRNA)
- Antisense oligonucelotides (ASOs)
- DNA
- Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs)
In digital PCR (dPCR, ddPCR, droplet PCR), the sample is partitioned into thousands of individual reactions, with a PCR reaction occurring in each partition. Each partition yields a positive or negative signal; therefore, it is called digital.
The MIQE (Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments) guidelines for dPCR extend the original MIQE guidelines developed for qPCR. They provide a framework to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and accuracy in digital PCR experiments.
TATAA Biocenter co-authored the MIQE and dMIQE guidelines, integrating these principles into our workflows to uphold rigorous assay validation, standardized methodologies, and stringent quality controls.
While regulatory guidance from the FDA and EMA on digital PCR assay validation remains incomplete and evolving, TATAA Biocenter has actively shaped industry standards. In 2024, alongside 37 industry experts from 24 organizations, we published the AAPS paper “Recommendations for Method Development and Validation of qPCR and dPCR Assays in Support of Cell and Gene Therapy Drug Development,” establishing industry-aligned best practices for regulated applications.